Opinion: How Cayman can follow Hawaii’s blueprint for solar revolution

Video game entrepreneur Henk Rogers helped Hawaii switch to green energy. Now he wants to help Cayman do the same.

The energy lab at Henk Rogers’ ranch in Hawaii. – Photo: Supplied
Henk Rogers

Guest column by Henk Rogers

The Cayman Islands are a paradise – pristine beaches, world-class diving, and unique wildlife, like endangered blue iguanas and rare birds like the red-footed boobies.

They are also the Caribbean islands most negatively impacted by extreme weather, and the fifth-most vulnerable islands in the region to rising sea levels.

The irony is the Cayman Islands aren’t just victims of climate change – they are also significant contributors to the problem.

According to the World Bank, the Cayman Islands consumed 655 million kilowatt hours of electricity in 2019, with only 2.5% of that being produced from island-based renewable sources.

I have lived in Hawaii for much of the last 50 years, and I understand precisely the problems the Cayman Islands are facing. I’ve also participated in Hawaii’s energy transformation and know how the lessons we’ve learned in the Pacific can help our Caribbean friends improve their relationship to energy and have a more resilient, affordable and climate-friendly future.

But we need all of the key stakeholders in the Cayman Islands onboard, and right now we’re facing considerable resistance from one of those stakeholders: the Caribbean Utilities Company, the electricity provider for Grand Cayman.

But first, a little history.

Ditching dirty energy

Before 2015, Hawaii was one of the largest consumers of fossil fuels per capita on the planet. There is no well-populated island more isolated on the globe than Hawaii, and the islands were at the mercy of oil-producing cartels, shelling out upward of US$6 billion a year on dirty energy – petroleum and coal – to fuel the archipelago.

The state’s political and business leadership recognised that the system in place was unhealthy for its citizens, was economically unsound (that money did not stay in the local economy), and was contributing to the climate crisis to dramatic effect in Hawaii. Like other island states, Hawaii was ground zero for the negative impacts of climate change – from extreme storms and flooding to rising sea levels to devastated coral reefs and ecosystems.

In turn, these negative impacts had deleterious effects on human health, communities, our economy and tourism.

In 2007, I founded Blue Planet Foundation, a non-profit that led the movement to establish a 100% renewable-energy transition for the state by 2045. The road was challenging, but ultimately we were successful, and Governor David Ige signed legislation in 2015 making Hawaii the first US state to legislatively mandate a transition to 100% renewable energy.

This was a landmark decision, and one that has since seen more than 20 US states and territories embrace their own versions of this law. Since Hawaii passed that legislation, I founded Blue Planet Alliance, another non-profit, whose mission is to replicate the success we had in Hawaii with other island countries and territories globally.

Last year, we launched a fellowship programme, in which we convene representatives of other islands in Hawaii for a week-long deep dive with local experts into the technical, economic and leadership challenges of transitioning from fossil fuels. We help participating islands develop their own 100% renewable-energy transition plans and create a strategy to make it a reality.

Making it a reality is no easy task. In Hawaii, navigating the relationship with the state’s primary utility, Hawaiian Electric, was the most difficult part of the protracted endeavour. They were wed to their monopoly business model of operating fossil-based power plants,
and the new renewable future was uncertain and scary for a large corporation. This is where island leadership was necessary to set the vision for the future – even over the objection of the utility.

From opponents to partners

Interestingly, after Hawaii’s 100% legislation was adopted, Hawaiian Electric – forced to do a long-range analysis of powering the grid with only renewable energy – found that Hawaii’s 100% clean-energy future could be achieved five years ahead of schedule, at a cost that was billions less than ‘business as usual’, all while working collaboratively with consumers and the private sector.

We helped them devise a business model that was a win-win-win-win: an energy source that was healthier for the planet, more affordable for consumers, better economically for Hawaii, and allowed the utility to make more money.

We’re working to recreate this success story through the Blue Planet Fellowship programme. That first cohort last October comprised eight islands – seven from the Pacific region (many of which have since followed through with proposed legislation for transitions to 100% renewable energy) and the Cayman Islands, our sole Caribbean representative.

The representatives from the Cayman Islands were very committed to bringing renewable energy to their home country. One of those representatives, James Whittaker – chairman of the Cayman Islands Energy Policy Council – spoke poignantly about the environmental impacts on the baby red crab population, which has greatly diminished since his childhood.

But, just as we encountered in Hawaii, despite the support for more renewable energy, the Cayman Islands are getting major pushback from the utility company. It is worth noting that CUC is a Canada-based public company with a monopoly contract for the transmission of electricity in Grand Cayman, which is enforceable through 2048.

Pushing a flawed ‘solution’

Publicly, CUC has embraced solar energy and other renewableenergy sources. But it’s unclear if their private actions are truly aligned with a low-cost, clean-energy future for the Cayman Islands. CUC has recently suggested that importing a new fossil fuel – liquefied natural gas, or LNG – will somehow be a better choice than renewable energy. We heard something similar from the Hawaii utility 10 years ago before we committed to 100% fossil-free energy.

In 2014, Hawaiian Electric argued that importing LNG would serve as a low-cost ‘bridge’ fuel to our clean-energy future. They went so far as to sign an agreement with Fortis, the company that owns a majority stake in CUC, for importing the LNG.

Hawaii leadership ultimately rejected this proposal after learning that the purported cost savings were unlikely to materialise – particularly given the costly infrastructure upgrades needed to receive that fossil fuel.

What’s more, the environmental claims that LNG was somehow a ‘cleaner’ fuel fell apart when examined closer. Several analyses conclude that the lifecycle-climate impact associated with LNG production, transport and energy generation are greater than those of other fossil fuels – even coal. Fortunately, Hawaii instead decided that our future was 100% renewable – a future that was incompatible with importing a new fossil fuel.

That decision paid off. The Hawaiian Electric service territory is, as of 2023, between 30% and 52% renewable, and the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative grid is currently about 70% renewable. The Kauai example is particularly relevant for Grand Cayman, as they have nearly identical populations (about 75,000) and similarly sized electricity grids (about 166 megawatts for Grand Cayman and 236 megawatts for Kauai).

Solar power from rooftops is currently the largest source of clean energy in Hawaii. Over 100,000 homes have solar-power plants on their roof – more than one-third of all detached single-family dwellings in the state. Besides the fact that they produce power without having to take up valuable farmland and conservation space, they are decreasing customer bills, increasing resiliency, creating new solar jobs and reducing our carbon emissions.

We are eager to share what we’re learning in Hawaii with the Cayman Islands’ leadership, residents and CUC. As we found through our experience in Hawaii, working with the utility is much more productive than fighting if we want to accelerate a future that benefits
people, planet and prosperity. We are convinced they will make more money if they work collaboratively and embrace the rapid switch to renewables – money that will stay circulating in the Cayman economy.

We are continuing to work with the Cayman Islands representatives who attended our October fellowship programme, just as we are continuing to work with the seven other islands that participated. Our vision is an enormous diplomatic bloc of 50 islands that will matriculate our programme in just three years – 50 islands on their own path to 100% renewable energy. Imagine what kind of demonstration that will be to mainland powers like China, India and the United States.

We hope CUC can share our vision of collaborating toward a cleaner, healthier, less threatened and more prosperous future – and what we’ve learned can help them get there.

Henk Rogers is the founder of the non-profit Blue Planet

Opinion: How Cayman can follow Hawaii’s blueprint for solar revolution

Cayman has room for full rollout of renewables

Cayman has room for full rollout of renewables : Cayman News Service

CNS): The suggestion that Cayman doesn’t have room to accommodate enough solar panels or wind turbines to generate all of its power from renewables has been debunked in the government’s new draft National Energy Policy. The revised policy, which is even more ambitious than the last one, has a target of generating 100% of our power from green resources by 2050 and 30% by 2030. While it has been established that Cayman has the capacity to adapt to a greener future, it now needs to pick up the pace.

According to the draft NEP, in order to meet the 100% renewable energy target by 2050, the Cayman Islands will have to have solar panels on rooftops, car parks and old quarries in addition to utility-sized solar farms and also review the exclusion zones to develop wind farms.

Cayman has room for full rollout of renewables

100% Renewable Energy By 2045 For Cayman Islands

As you will discover in this video the fossil fuel utilities in Hawaii are capable of realizing what is best for their state and their citizens.

The Hawaiian people have collectively decided to switch to 100% Renewable Energy by 2045, and have passed a law to ensure this policy is carried out.

Unfortunately, the Management and Board of Directors of Fortis Inc (Majority Shareholders of CUC) apparently put profit over people.

Let us change these islands to 100% Renewable Energy and lower the cost of living.

Please share this video widely with all your family, friends and social media contacts.

OfReg commissions Value Of Solar Study for the Cayman Islands

OfReg commissions Value Of Solar Study for the Cayman Islands 

 OfReg Office has engaged RMI, https://rmi.org/ the renowned renewable energy consultants working to accelerate the transition to clean energy, to conduct a Value Of Solar Study specifically to address the unique aspects of the local distributed solar marketplace. The scope of the work is intended to assess the value of Photovoltaic (PV) generation from a utility and societal perspective in the Cayman Islands.
The study will include impacts on the transmission and distribution grid, energy costs, address rate design options, and the economic potential of local distributed solar energy systems. 

The Sunswift eVe solar-powered car broke a 26-year-old land speed record for electric vehicles

The Sunswift eVe solar-powered car broke a 26-year-old land speed record for electric vehicles on Wednesday at the Australian Automotive Research Center in Victoria. While the record still has to be ratified by the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile, it would make eVe the fastest electric car to ever compete a 500 km set distance course by a significant margin, Gizmodo reported. The previous record, set in 1988, was an average speed of 73 kilometers per hour; the Sunswift eVe reached 100 km per hour average over the 500 km course.

Sunswift eVe, designed and built by students at the University of New South Wales, seeks to overcome the traditional obstacles that have impeded solar-powered cars, namely, offering both speed and range in the same vehicle.

“There are many solar cars out there with a long range, and many other solar cars capable of even higher speeds,” Rob Ireland, business team leader at Sunswift, told International Business Times. “However, we’re trying to do something ground-breaking and overcome both.”

The zero-emission solar and battery storage electric vehicle is capable of covering 800 km on a single charge and has a top speed of 140 km per hour (87 miles per hour). The car’s solar panels have an 800-watt output and when the sun isn’t shining, eVe relies on its battery pack, reducing drivers’ range anxiety. The car’s motor, “supplied by Australian national science agency CSIRO, operates at 97 percent efficiency, meaning eVe consumes as much power as a kitchen toaster,” according to IB Times.

For Wednesday’s record attempt, the solar panels on the roof and hood were used to charge the battery, but were covered for the actual run, as the attempt had to be completed on a single charge.

While the Sunswift eVe is not fully road legal, the team believes that isn’t far out of reach, telling Renew Economy they hope to have the vehicle on Australian roads within the year as “a symbol for a new era of sustainable driving.” And Ireland said the practicality of the two-seat, four-wheel car is unmatched among solar-powered vehicles.

In the run-up to their attempt at the land speed record, project director and third-year engineering student Hayden Smith explained to Renew Economy why it was so significant. “Five hundred kilometers is pretty much as far as a normal person would want to drive in a single day,” Smith said. “It’s another demonstration that one day you could be driving our car.” More

 

IEA says ‘peak oil demand’ could hit as early as 2020

Little more that a year after the International Energy Agency added its voice to the chorus chiming that peak oil was dead, a new report from the uconservative adviser to industrialised nations suggests it has changed its tune. Only this time it is not peak supply that is on its radar, but peak demand.

The IEA’s Medium-Term Oil Market Report 2014 has predicted that global growth in oil demand may start to slow down as soon as the end of this decade, due to environmental concerns and cheaper alternatives, and despite boosting its 2014 forecast of global demand by 960,000 barrels per day.

While supply is forecast to remain strong – thanks largely to the unconventional, or “tight” oil revolution currently underway in north America – the IEA says it expects the global market to hit an “inflexion point”, by the end of 2019, “after which demand growth may start to decelerate due to high oil prices, environmental concerns and cheaper fuel alternatives.”

These factors, says the report, will lead to fuel-switching away from oil, as well as overall fuel savings. In short, it says, “while ‘peak demand’ for oil – other than in mature economies – may still be years away, and while there are regional differences, peak oil demand growth for the market as a whole is already in sight.”

It’s worrying news for the over-invested and under-prepared; not least of all oil importing nations, to which, as Samuel Alexander noted in this article last September, the economic costs of peak oil are especially significant.

“When oil gets expensive, everything dependent on oil gets more expensive: transport, mechanised labour, industrial food production, plastics, etc,” he wrote. “This pricing dynamic sucks discretionary expenditure and investment away from the rest of the economy, causing debt defaults, economic stagnation, recessions, or even longer-term depressions. That seems to be what we are seeing around the world today, with the risk of worse things to come.”

This then adds to the peak oil cycle, increasing governments’ motivation to decarbonise their economies – better late than never – “not only because oil has become painfully expensive, but also because the oil we are burning is environmentally unaffordable.”

This view has been echoed in numerous recent reports. US investment banks Sanford Bernstein raised the prospect of “energy price deflation”, caused by the plunging cost of solar and the taking up of market share by that technology as it displaced diesel, gas and oil in various economies. It predicted that could trigger a massive shift in capital.

Analyst Mark Fulton last month also questioned the wisdom of the private-sector investing over $1 trillion to develop new sources of high-cost oil production. While Mark Lewis, of French broking firm, suggested that $US19 trillion in revenuescould be lost from the oil industry if the world takes action to address climate change, cleans up pollution and moves to decarbonise the global energy system.

The IEA report also includes an updated forecast of product supply, which draws out the consequences of the shifts in demand, feedstock supply and refining capacity.

“Given planned refinery construction and the growth in supply that bypasses the refining sector, such as NGLs and biofuels, the refining industry faces a new cycle of weak margins and a glut of light distillates like gasoline and naphtha as a by-product of needed diesel and jet fuel,” it says.

It also predicts that “the unconventional supply revolution that has redrawn the global oil map” will expand beyond North America before the end of the decade, just as OPEC supplies face headwinds, and regional imbalances in gasoline and diesel markets broaden.

The report projects that by 2019, tight oil supply outside the United States could reach 650 000 barrels per day (650 kb/d), including 390 kb/d from Canada, 100 kb/d from Russia and 90 kb/d from Argentina. US LTO output is forecast to roughly double from 2013 levels to 5.0 million barrels per day (mb/d) by 2019.

“We are continuing to see unprecedented production growth from North America, and the United States in particular. By the end of the decade, North America will have the capacity to become a net exporter of oil liquids,” IEA Executive Director Maria van der Hoeven said as she launched the report in Paris. “At the same time, while OPEC remains a vital supplier to the market, it faces significant headwinds in expanding capacity.”

Beyond ageing fields, the major hurdle facing OPEC producers is the escalation in “above-ground woes,” as security concerns become a growing issue in producers like Iraq, and investment risks deter investment and exploration.

The report notes that as much as three-fifths of OPEC’s expected growth in capacity by 2019 is set to come from Iraq. The projected addition of 1.28 mb/d to Iraqi production by 2019, a conservative forecast made before the launch last week of a military campaign by insurgents that subsequently claimed several key cities in northern and central Iraq, faces considerable downside risk. More